"Bad Day": Trump Reflects On Assassination Bid One Year Later

07/11/25 4:57 AM

US President Donald Trump says "mistakes were made" but he's satisfied with the investigation into his near-assassination a year ago, as the Secret Service announced disciplinary actions Thursday against six staff members.

"Drone Might Hit Him": Khamenei's Advisor Threatens To Assassinate Trump

07/10/25 11:22 PM

Mohammad-Javad Larijani, a former senior adviser to Iran's supreme leader has suggested that US President Donald Trump could be attacked by Iran while sunbathing at his Mar-a-Lago mansion in Florida.

"Will Strike Iran Again If Threatened," Says Israel Defence Minister

07/11/25 12:24 AM

Israel will strike Iran again if it is threatened by Tehran, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday.

'Brain is peanut butter': Trump mocked for calling Japanese leader 'Mr. Japan'

06/29/25 5:56 PM

President Donald Trump was brutally mocked over the weekend after he referred to Japan's leader as "Mr. Japan."The president made the statement during an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo about tariffs. As his July 9 deadline for tariff deals approached, Trump said he would rather send a letter to countries instead of negotiating."But I'd rather just send them a letter, a very fair letter, saying, congratulations, whether it will allow you to trade in the United States of America," Trump told Bartiromo. "You're going to pay a 25% tariff, or 20% or 40% or 50%. I would rather do that.""We'll send a letter and we'll say we would consider it a great honor, and this is what you'll have to do to shop in the United States," he opined. "We're like a department store to shop in the United States, and you'll pay a 25% tariff, or we wish you a lot of luck, and that's the end of the trade deal.""I could send one to Japan. Dear Mr. Japan, here's the story. You're going to pay a 25% tariff on your cars."Trump's statement was met with mockery online."His brain is peanut butter," commenter Leslie Jones wrote."If President Biden started a sentence with 'Dear Mr. Japan,' Republicans would never shut up about it and '25th Amendment' is all they'd be talking about," another commenter said. "This is f—ing INSANE.""Paging Jake Tapper," D. Villella joked."If Biden said that Maria would have leaped into the air to wave the DEMENTED flag on air," one person noted.Watch the video below from Fox News.

'Coincidence? Not even close': Ex-Trump operative blows up White House narrative

07/05/25 9:43 PM

Donald Trump and the media insist on one version of events, but a former Trump associate insists there's more to the story.Trump recently completed a phone call with Putin, which the media has reported led to no progress in halting the war on Ukraine. A follow-up call with Ukraine's leader was reported as having featured Trump offering some assistance.But there's more to the call with Ukraine's leader, according to Lev Parnas, a former associate of Trump who worked on issues related to Ukraine during the president's first term.Parnas on his Substack flagged a devastating attack on Ukraine right after the call with Trump, saying, "The attack wasn’t random. It was systematic, with multiple drones launched in waves designed to overwhelm air defense systems. Targets included civilian zones, energy infrastructure, and transit hubs, with some of the heaviest activity tracked near Kirov Oblast—a name that’s now entering military dispatches as a hub for these new tactics."According to Parnas, the attack was directly connected to Trump's publicized calls with foreign leaders. "This is Putin’s escalation, timed perfectly after Trump’s back-to-back calls with him and then with Zelensky. Coincidence? Not even close," the ex-associate said, before blowing up the White House's (and the media's) description of the call."According to the press, Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was 'productive' and 'supportive.' But my sources—inside the room—tell a different story," he said. "Trump made no commitments to deliver weapons. He vaguely mentioned that he’d 'look into' retrieving U.S.-supplied arms that were held up. But as I’ve told you for weeks, this is part of a calculated delay tactic."According to Parnas, "Donald Trump has no intention of sending Ukraine the weapons it needs.""The strategy is simple: stall the Ukrainians, comfort Putin, and let the situation in eastern Ukraine deteriorate while Washington is distracted with optics," the ex-insider added. "I’m also hearing credible intel about a large-scale Russian troop buildup in the Sunni region, with over 50,000 troops mobilizing. The kind of movement that signals a major new offensive—one that could shift the war."Read the piece here.

'Deliberately lying': Trump hammered over 'horrible' new trade deal

07/02/25 6:56 PM

President Donald Trump announced his second trade deal as part of his "90 Deals in 90 Days" marathon, and this one is with Vietnam. For political analysts, however, the deal doesn't look as good as Trump boasts. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after speaking with To Lam, the Highly Respected General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam," Trump announced on Truth Social Wednesday.Trump said that all imports from Vietnam will be taxed at 20% with a 40% tax on "transshipping." He goes on to celebrate that the United States will have "TOTAL ACCESS" to sell U.S. goods in Vietnam. As foreign affairs journalist Olga Nesterova explained, Trump is taxing Americans 20-40% while Vietnam gets products for free. However, the country's economy, cost of living and salaries are vastly different from those in the United States. For example, Numbeo data shows the cost of a 12-ounce bottle of soda is about 50 cents. The monthly cell phone bill with at least 10 gigabytes of data is under $6. A one-bedroom apartment in the City Centre averages under $400 a month.As political and media researcher Craig Harrington explained, "Our trade relationship with Vietnam was growing before Trump, but we still only exported $13.1 billion worth of goods to Vietnam in 2024 (they exported $136.6 billion to us). Tariffs aren't the reason we don't export much to Vietnam, it's because they are poorer than we are."Meanwhile, University of Michigan professor of public policy and economics, Justin Wolfers, noted on X, "'New' trade deal just dropped: US businesses get tariff-free access to the Vietnamese market, just as they were offered 8 years ago in the TPP, but Trump refused to sign. In addition, Trump's imposing a 20% tax on Americans who import goods from Vietnam."Political commentator Brian Krassenstein posted on X that the deal is "horrible" for the U.S."Trump announces what appears to be a horrible trade deal for the United States and Vietnam. American businesses will now be paying between 20 and 40% for imports coming from Vietnam. It’s literally like they want inflation," he wrote. The group Republicans Against Trump agreed, noting, it "sounds like a really terrible deal."Harrington pointed out that on April 4, there was a "zero-rate tariff offer in Vietnam was proposed." Trump announced his "Liberation Day" on April 2. "He's essentially done nothing in 3 months. A true genius at work. The art of the deal."Zeteo News founder and former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan attacked, "Trump is brazenly and deliberately lying here - but American consumers and businesses will pay."

'Disgusting!' Trump's border czar rages after judge hands Trump court loss

06/30/25 10:00 PM

Federal judges have found a way to get under the skin of Tom Homan, President Donald Trump's "border czar." And it involves protecting the rights of migrants that Homan wants to deport. On Monday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes agreed to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia in federal custody until at least mid-July over fears that he could be deported again. Abrego Garcia was deported to the infamous Salvadoran prison CECOT in March, even though an immigration judge granted him the legal right to remain in the United States in 2019 because of a well-founded fear of persecution if he returned to El Salvador. Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States in June after months of wrangling between the Trump administration and federal courts. The judge's decision irked Homan, and he appeared on Fox News' "The Will Cain Show" to voice his displeasure. "It's just another disgusting story," Homan said. "These judges are telling us, 'I don't want you to abide by federal court orders issued by two judges that say this person needs to be deported.'"The situation between federal officials and Abrego Garcia came to a head last week. Holmes granted Abrego Garcia's request for a pre-trial release while he fights federal human trafficking charges. He has pleaded not guilty to charges. However, Abrego Garcia's lawyers told Holmes there was a high probability that immigration officials would detain Abrego Garcia again if he were released. The Department of Justice acknowledged this possibility in court, which caused Holmes to delay issuing her ruling on Abrego Garcia's release. Homan described Holmes delaying her order to release Abrego Garcia as a "radical, independent decision." He said the Justice Department and Attorney General Pam Bondi are "on top of this" recent ruling, and that they will "take this fight all the way." "Bottom line is, there is no place in this country for this man," Homan said. You can watch the entire exchange here.

'Faded away': Expert despairs as Supreme Court ends 'glimmer of independence'

07/08/25 1:10 PM

Any sign that the right-wing majority on the Supreme Court were interested in checking President Donald Trump's power have subsided, legal analyst Mark Joseph Stern wrote for Slate in a scathing roundup of the court's agenda this term.He focused particularly on the abrupt heel-turn of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Trump's third appointee.His column follows the court's abrupt decision to allow the Trump administration to deport migrants to South Sudan, despite them never having been to that country and despite a near-total lack of due process."Less than six months into the second Trump administration, the Supreme Court has settled on a posture of complicity toward the executive branch’s assault on civil liberties and democracy itself," wrote Stern. "The 47th president seeks to restructure the government around his own whims, blasting through any barrier that restrains him as he embarks on a project to illegally freeze spending, end birthright citizenship, and disappear noncitizens to black sites, among other autocratic ambitions. And six Republican-appointed justices are falling over themselves to help him do it."The particularly notable thing about the sudden shower of shadow-docket decisions nullifying lower-court checks on Trump, as well as the potentially landmark Trump v. CASA decision that puts new limits on the ability to even block illegal orders from the Trump administration, is how quickly the Supreme Court's modicum of resistance to Trump fell apart, Stern wrote."From January through March, the court looked to be taking a cautious approach to his presidency, seeking out compromises and imposing limits on his authority," he wrote. "Early on, Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s vote seemed to be in play, as did Chief Justice John Roberts’, to a lesser extent. Along with the liberals, the two justices forced Trump to attend his criminal sentencing shortly before he reentered the White House. They ordered his administration to pay out $2 billion in foreign aid that it illegally withheld." The two justices then joined a few liberal dissents when the majority allowed Trump to resume certain illegal deportations and withhold Education Department grants.However, he continued, "By May, these glimmers of independence had faded away. Roberts and Barrett now appear to be almost entirely on board with Trump’s agenda, enabling his consolidation of power at the expense of the other branches, the states, and the people. Perhaps they have simply given up trying to police this administration, fearing that, if they continued to try, they would reveal their own impotence in the face of an aspiring autocrat. Or maybe, as CASA suggests, they believe that the biggest outrage of Trump’s term so far isn’t his own lawless agenda, but the lower courts that dare shoot it down."At this point, Stern continued, the only areas in which these justices shoot down Trump, as with placing limits on the Alien Enemies Act for deportations, it "may be better understood as preserving the court’s own authority — reminding the president that, in the end, the justices get the final say on what the law requires." But all too often, that say still goes in Trump's favor, he concluded.

'Go a little bit quicker': Trump scolds African leaders for talking too much

07/09/25 5:43 PM

President Donald Trump scolded the leaders of several African nations because he said they were talking too much.At a luncheon with the leaders on Wednesday, Trump spoke at length about his accomplishments before handing the floor over to the president of Mauritania. Within minutes, however, the U.S. president lost his patience and signaled for the leader to wrap up his remarks."I appreciate it," Trump said. "Maybe we're going to have to go a little bit quicker than this because we have a whole schedule. If I could just say your name and your country would be great."Watch the video below from C-SPAN or click here.

'Humiliating': MSNBC panel says Putin 'laughing' at 'snowflake' Trump

07/08/25 9:55 PM

Russian President Vladimir Putin is laughing at President Donald Trump, said one MSNBC host on Tuesday. Trump has been asked about Putin and the state of the war against Ukraine after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth paused a weapons shipment to the war-torn country. On Tuesday, when asked about the matter, Trump said, "We get a lot of bulls--- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.""Another reversal from Donald Trump today after a seemingly humiliating call during which he admitted he again made zero progress," MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said. "Getting to this took maybe the clearest, most obvious sign yet that Putin doesn't want peace," Wallace continued, noting that he launched "the largest air attack against Ukraine since the start of the war, just hours after his call with Donald J. Trump."The Atlantic's Anne Applebaum said that, despite Trump's anger with Putin, he still seems to be laying on compliments while halting the issuance of new sanctions on Russia. It's one of several things she said is "sending a message to the Russians, telling them, essentially, that the U.S. isn't playing the game anymore, and they're welcome to keep going. And that's why Putin is still going. That's why he's stepping up his attacks."She was speaking to Wallace from Warsaw, Poland, and noted that Europeans see Trump making concessions to Putin."And then, somehow, Trump is surprised when Putin laughs at him and continues fighting, even though he said he seemed to believe that he said he wouldn't," said Applebaum. Wallace wondered if there was a strategic play to move Trump away from the Russians while he's being "so publicly ignored. And it would seem Putin's laughing at him. He gets off the phone and bombs the you-know-what out of Ukraine after Trump asks him not to. I mean, is there any consideration given to playing this very public humiliation of Donald Trump that Vladimir Putin is clearly enjoying?"Applebaum said that many Republican senators have pushed back on Trump "for a long time." After a commercial break, Wallace recalled Trump being asked who he turns to for advice, and Trump said "himself" and his "big brain."Commentator John Heilemann called Trump a "pouty little snowflake," who "sounds like a 14-year-old who's just been learning the hard way that the quarterback, the varsity quarterback, just is not into her — or into him. Whichever. It's just, it's the most infantile kind of pathetic display."See the discussions below or at the link here. - YouTube www.youtube.com - YouTube youtu.be